Depressing good times at the moving picture show.
A Single Man
Colin Firth has been nominated for his role as a grieving gay man in 1960’s Los Angeles, and it’s well deserved. The story follows George (Firth) on a very difficult day. His partner has died in a car accident and George is lost. He can’t even attend the funereal since they were closeted to even family members. He takes little solace in day-to-day life, but it’s not enough. He has made a choice, at the end of the day he will kill himself. He spends the day tying up loose ends and making final preparations.
This film is very stylish. It was directed by Tom Ford, a former fashion designer. His background really pays off in the look of the film. Many times when making films set in the sixties or seventies, art directors will get kitschy. But here, everything feels so authentic, from the decor of Charley’s (Julianne Moore) house to the console record player/stereo at George’s place. It’s real easy to get lost in the look of the film.
A Single Man is Fords first movie and his direction shows that. For the most part it’s solid but, there are moments his artistic side gets out of control. Early in the film George drives by a house with a typical American family. The young daughter is out front playing jump rope, as passes by in slow motion, pondering what a different life might have offered him. But the scene carries on too long, with almost operatic music playing. Very stylish but also distracting.
A Single Man is a solid flick that really captures what it’s like to be a true outsider. Imagine losing a loved one and not being able to properly grieve. No funerals or comforting family. Just loss and pain because you don’t belong.
**** out of *****
Brothers
It’s kind of funny how similar the themes in Brothers and A Single Man are.
Sam (Toby Maguire) is a good husband and father. He is married to Grace (Natalie Portman) and they have two young daughters. His love for his family just oozes out of his smile and in his eyes. He also loves his country, he’s a marine who has already been to Afghanistan, and is preparing for another tour of duty. But before he leaves he picks up his brother Tommy (Jake Gyllenhaal) from prison and offers a helping hand. We get a feeling that there is some tension in the family, most of it comes from their father (Sam Shepard).
Sam goes off to war, his helicopter is shot down and all are believed dead. Back home Grace mourns her loss and does her best to carry on. One night after a bender Tommy calls her because he needs money or will go back to prison. She helps and the two start to bond. He becomes a surrogate father to the girls and helps out around the house.
Now, the set up sounds very cliché. But as Roger Ebert once said, “A movie isn’t really what it’s about, but how it’s about it”. Every time the movie starts to feel like a typical movie, it swerves. The burgeoning relationship between Tommy and Grace never gets out of control. The writers let the characters bond, but never let them forget the gravity of their situation. These are two people who deep down want to get together, but also realize it may not be the best thing for everyone involved.
When Sam comes back he is a full of guilt and jealousy. The helping hand that Sam offered early on was that of someone on the inside. Sam was the family man who was happy to be a part of something bigger than him. He feels an almost pity for his brother who was the odd man out. But now the roles are reversed, Sam has changed in ways only a soldier can understand. In his absence Tommy has become the de-facto family man.
Brothers is a remake of the 2004 Denmark film, Brodre. I’m really curious to see that film now, this story feels so American it’s hard to imagine the scenario taking place in another country. Brothers has solid acting from the three leads and an excellent screenplay. It’s akin to The Hurt Locker in that it is a story about the people in a war, but offers no messages or easy answers. It succeeds where a film like Stop-loss fails, showing how war affects soldiers and their familyies even after the fighting is over.
**** out of *****
Movie Review: The Great Buck Howard
All over the country are small venue theaters, the kind of places that seat 1,500 maybe 2,000 people a show. Former palaces that all the big name acts used to play. Now the big names stick to larger arenas that hold 20,000 a night. But what about those old theaters and acts? Don’t people still want entertainment from the acts they remember? Don’t the old theaters still need attractions to put butts in the seats?
The Great Buck Howard tells the story of a law student named Troy (Colin Hanks) who discovers he’s not happy learning the law. Dropping out of school he soon takes a job as road manager for Buck Howard (John Malkovich). Howard was once a world-famous “mentalist”, playing all over the world and appearing on The Tonight Show with Johnny Carson 61 times. Now he plays to small time crowds doing the same act that once made him popular. The crowds are smaller but people still seems to enjoy what he does.
The movie, inspired by real life magician “The Amazing Kreskin” is a nice character study. Balancing the sadness of a performer past his prime, with the idealism a young man looking to find his path in life. Though he lives in denial of it Buck knows he’s hardly relevant but keeps hoping for that one big “effect” that will bolt him back to stardom. While he still enjoys playing to half filled theaters, it bothers him that he’s not a bigger star. No one wants to feel like their life’s work has become a joke.
Troy meanwhile refuses to view Buck as a pathetic figure. He sees him as a talented performer who still entertains. Troy faces pressure from his father (Tom Hanks) whose concerned his son is throwing his life away. In spite of this Troy finds meaning in being a part of Buck’s show. A quiet dignity that law school would never give him.
The Great Buck Howard had a very limited but interesting release pattern. It first played on HDnet movies and on demand before getting a small release on the art house circuit. Now out on DVD it will hopefully find a larger audience that will appreciate it. The movie is much like the title character. It won’t reinvent the wheel, it may not show you anything you haven’t seen before. But give it an hour and half and it will entertain you.
**** out of *****
Review Roundup!
Kicking off 2010 with my final reviews of 2009! I recently started doing some comic book reviews for popsyndicate.com. I’ve reviewed Incorruptible #1, God Complex #1, Creepy #2, Indiana Jones Adventures #2, and Ex Occultous.
All of which can be found here.
When you have a few minutes make sure to check out the TV Jedi blog run by Wendy Weber!
Now on to the final Popcorn Panel reviews of 2009!
The Invention of Lying
The invention of lying is a frustrating movie. On one hand it’s a sweet romantic comedy. Ricky Gervais and Jennifer Garner come off as a funny and charming couple that deserve to be together.
On the other hand the premise, a world where no one can lie except Gervais, becomes a bit tiresome. It’s not enough every character has to be honest, they bare their souls repeatedly. Also there is a subplot about religion that is far more interesting than the rest of the film but is dropped suddenly. This movie is one worth seeing, just not in the theater.
Where The Wild Things Are:
Growing up is tough and filled with danger. Like having your snow fort destroyed or getting so mad you bite your mom. Part of maturity is learning to take a look at yourself and dealing with those fears.
Little Max has a really fun way of doing just that. He goes to a place inside his head. A place where these feelings are are alternately fun and scary. Where The Wild Things Are is an imaginative and entertaining film about issues both adults and kids can relate to. It is a great film and one worth seeing in the theater.
Amelia:
Amelia Earhart lived an exciting life. She literally traveled the world and saw things most people of either gender never will. She was a pioneer during the infancy of the aviation industry. She did not live a boring life, for this she was rewarded with a boring bio-pic.
Filled with toothy smiles and bad accents, “Amelia” is a clunker. One where the audience continuously checks the time. There are some nice shots of the planes flying over the clouds but nothing worth seeing. “Amelia” is not really a bad film, just a boring one. Recommended only for insomniacs.
The Twilight Saga: New Moon:
The high school girl falls in love with the sparkly vampire. The werewolf falls in love with the girl. But instead of doing anything about it, the vampire runs away, the girl broods, and the werewolf refuses to wear a shirt. Sounds like a joke, but it’s no joke and its not funny, or interesting.
The remarkable thing about New Moon is every time something compelling is introduced, the Native-American Werewolf clan or the Vampire hierarchy, it is completely ignored. A step-up from the first movie, but still a long way to go make one of these films truly enjoyable.
Invictus:
INVICTUS is a movie about great ideals. It shows us that forgiveness is the path to change. That sports can be a unifying force in society. The only way politics can truly work is to actually treat everyone as equals. The film is well made and acted, Morgan Freeman seems born to play the role of Nelson Mandela. Yet it lacks the personal element that could have made it great. If released during a slower period at the box office it would be worth seeing at the theater. But with an abundance of interesting films out, INVICTUS can wait.
Avatar:
AVATAR is a spectacularly visual movie. The world the story is set in is contains everything from floating mountains to fluorescent plants that create a stunning environment. Even more amazing are the creatures in the movie.
Motion capture computers are used so flawlessly it is impossible to tell if the aliens are computer generated or actors in costume. Director James Cameron has really raised the bar on the use of C.G. In film. The script, not so groundbreaking, is passable but nothing to get excited about. But in all fairness AVATAR was made to showcase the visuals, not the plot.
Movie Review: Teachers

Growing up in the early eighties movie choices were somewhat limited. VHS was just catching on and new releases were sometimes difficult to come by. But we could always count on HBO to entertain us.
The only problem is they ran the same movies over and over. Most movie geeks who grew up in that time probably remember movies like Midnight Madness being played on a seemingly continuous loop. One of these films, Teachers, was a favorite of mine. But would it hold up after all these years?
Alex Jurel (Nick Nolte) is a popular Social Studies teacher at J.F.K. High School. He seems to be so popular because he treats the students as people instead of kids. After many years as a teacher he seems to have been worn down. We get hints that in his early years he was pretty idealistic, now he seems to be coasting through life.
The central conflict of the movie is what will Alex say at an upcoming deposition? A former student is suing the school on the grounds that he was given passing grades he did not deserve. The lead attorney for the plaintiff is Lisa Hammond (Jo Beth Williams). After a coordinated lack of cooperation on behalf of the school district, Hammond decides to hold depositions at the school. Of course she has other motives, not only did she graduate from the school, but she has also had a lifelong crush on Jurel. So the question becomes will the formerly idealistic teacher do the right thing and testify against the school or will he tote the company line?
It seems like that alone would be enough for one movie, not the case here. Other sub-plots are added. Some are meant to be funny, like the story of the mental patient (Richard Mulligan) who impersonates a substitute teacher. Others are meant to showcase what issues big city schools face; violence, teen pregnancy, and general apathy. Very ambitious but in the end there is more drama at this school than in a soap opera.
One might mistake it for a soap opera. While there is a talented cast (Nolte, Williams, Mulligan, Judd Hirsch, Laura Dern, Ralphh Macchio, Crispin Glover, etc) does their best to deliver the overexaggeratedd dialog with a straight face but much of the dialog comes off as cheesy. Throw in several dramatic moments punctuated with “inspirational” 80’s rock and you have a recipe for melodrama.
Despite the heightened dramatics there is still a lot to like in Teachers. Jurel’s do the right thing or take the easy path of compliance works very well. The characters themselves are mostly likable and sympathetic. Many issues addressed in the film still feel relevant today. While the movie itself may not be AS good as I’d remembered it to be, it’s still an enjoyable watch.
*** out of *****
Movie Review: The Men Who Stare At Goats
“All things considered
He’s not bitter
He’s not mean (and he’s not done)
All things considered, what he’s telling us
Isn’t hurting anyone”
“All Things Considered” by The Mighty Mighty Bosstones.
Bob Wilton (Ewan McGregor) has reached a point where life as a newspaperman has become not so rewarding. After his wife leaves him and a co-worker dies at work Bob feels the call to do something with his life. But what? After a strange interview he decides to head to Iraq to cover the start of the war.
Lyn Cassady (George Clooney) was lost too, except it was back in the eighties when he joined the U.S. Army looking for direction. Fortunatley for him Bill Django (Jeff Bridges) already found his own path in the Army, the path of the Jedi. Django set out to create “The New Earth Army”. A group of soldiers that would use all sorts of psychic abilities to become a group of warrior/monks.
If you’ve seen the trailers for The Men Who Stare At Goats you know the rest. Wilton decides to write a story about the Jedi after meeting Cassady. The two go on an adventure together filled with danger and many laughs. The movie is goofy and funny and profound in a couple of unexpected ways.
The story is something of an homage to the original Star Wars films, not only sharing a few themes but also commenting on the a what eventually happened to the franchise. One of the soldiers in the program is an opportunistic jerk named Larry Hooper (Kevin Spacey). Where Django is more about growth and spiritual balance, Hooper is much more manipulative. He likes to agitate and use these abilities for personal power. Eventually he forms his own business and becomes a contractor for the military in it’s war on terror. Thus taking something that filled people with joy and exploiting it for cash. Mirroring how many people felt about the Star Wars prequels.
But the central issue is by far the more interesting one. The Men Who Stare At Goats is filled with people searching for a greater meaning. Cassady even reflects that he never felt like he fit in anywhere until he was training to be a Jedi. The movie shows many instances where these people are attempting to use their abilities. But the fun thing is we’re generally not sure if they are crackpots or the real deal.
The beautiful part is it doesn’t matter. It’s not important if they can really walk through walls or stop a goat’s heart with through willpower. These are simply people searching for meaning and finding it. What could be more meaningful than that?
**** out of *****
Popcorn Panel Update
My P.P. review of INVENTION OF LYING is currently up at the Joliet Herald News website. Each week after a new set of reviews are added the oldest one falls off, so surf on over and check it out!
Popcorn Panel: http://www.suburbanchicagonews.com/heraldnews/entertainment/movies/index.html
Also, Josh Larsen is the driving force behind the Popcorn Panel, he allows us armchair critics to see our name in print thus making us instant celebrities amongst our family and friends. Josh is a good guy and a talented writer. Head over to his site, www.larsenonfilm.com and read some reviews!
Now, the Popcorn Panel reviews that are no longer on the Herald News site.
Inglorious Basterds
Every scene in INGLORIOUS BASTERDS has an undercurrent of danger flowing underneath it. A prime example occurs about halfway through in a scene set in basement tavern in Nazi occupied France. A group of saboteurs are to meet a contact in the bar. The group is shocked to find their informant playing drinking games with a table of SS soldiers. Every time the group seems to get comfortable, Director Quentin Tarantino expertly reveals a previously unseen layer of danger to the mix. INGLORIOUS BASTERDS is suspenseful, shocking, bloody, and fun. Get out and see this one right away.
Funny People
Funny People is what the title says, a group of people simply being funny. But when the laughs stop, the film derails. The funniest moments come when the movie is smartly riffing on the stupid comedies that are predominant in film and television. These scenes are especially funny since Adam Sandler is basically having fun at his own expense. Since the film is so smart it is confusing that the third act would descend into the same type of material it is making fun of. It is the film’s unevenness that makes it a funny, but ultimately disappointing mess.
Public Enemies
Every bio-pic takes liberties with it’s source material, the goal is to entertain, not teach. But if PUBLIC ENEMIES does teach anything at all, it’s that John Dillinger (Johnny Depp) only spoke in sentences written for movie trailers.The film follows the famed bank robber and the ‘G-Man’ (Christian Bale) assigned to catch him. Filled with dialog and scenes that are laughably bad or implausible, what could have been a fascinating thriller quickly becomes tiresome as the movie is unable to create any tension or excitement. For a better example of the genre, stay home and watch THE UNTOUCHABLES instead.
Whiteout
A friend of mine has a theory: more can be learned about how movies work by watching a bad film rather than a good one. This makes Whiteout not simply a bad film, but an educational one. Based on the comic, it’s interesting to see how differently the same story can be told. The comic is a smart and character driven mystery that never questions the reader’s intelligence. The movie is boring, cliched, and never trusts the audience to understand what is happening. Take the money you would have spent on this dud and seek out the graphic novel instead.
Make sure to check out the P.P. in the coming weeks for reviews of Where The Wild Things Are and Amelia.
More Rapid Reviews
First up, two more Popcorn Panel reviews.
Monsters Vs. Aliens 3D
For a 3D animated film, Monsters vs. Aliens it falls flat in all other regards. Intended to be a parody of 50’s sci-fi/horror films, it never feels enough like one to work. There are some interesting character moments and a few good gags but overall there is not enough tension to feel there is any real danger. Sometimes a celebrity voice can be be distracting in animation but not here. The actors are all right for the parts. Not a bad movie but not a memorable one either. Save yourself the extra charge and skip the 3D.
Observe and Report
“Observe and Report” is the story of a mall security chief played by Seth Rogen who dreams of becoming a police officer. However, his biggest obstacle is himself. He is clueless in almost every aspect of his life. At one point, in order to impress a girl, he gives her his bipolar medication. Despite his sometimes psychotic behavior, he is very determined to live by a moral code, however twisted it may be. The humor, more akin to “Bad Santa” than “Paul Blart: Mall Cop,” is very dark and uncomfortable, yet very funny and worth the price of admission.
Now on to the other films.
I Love You, Man
Any project featuring both Paul Rudd and Jason Segel gets my immediate attention. This movie, about a groom’s search to make a friend to be his best man, is full of laughs and most of them come from Rudd. He has this uncanny ability to be the guy who never quite fits into any crowd. The humor is mined from people in normal, albeit awkward situations. Funny people just being funny, end of story.
**** out of *****
Duplicity
Duplicity stars Julia Roberts and Clive Owen as a pair of corporate spies playing two business against each other. It’s a caper film along the lines of Ocean’s 11, just not as exciting. It’s funny and Roberts and Owen make a good couple but the rapid fire dialogue gets a little repetitive. I hate to say it but there was too much talking and not enough stealing.
*** out of *****
Sunshine Cleaning
This years Little Miss Sunshine/Indie darling. Quirky story about a pair of sisters who start a business cleaning up crime scenes. Along the way they deal with parental deaths, infidelity, and quirkiness! Parts work and the cast is good but the screenplay comes off as cliche ridden. Flawed but still somewhat likable.
** out of *****
17 Again
Your basic “It’s a Wonderful Life” type story. Nothing special but it is very funny mostly due to Thomas Lennon. Zac Efron is just entertaining enough to carry this light-weight little comedy. Nothing special but good for a few laughs.
*** out of *****
Earth
Disney is relaunching their Nature films with one called Earth. Following families of Polar Bears, Elephants, and Whales for one year. If you watch a lot of Discovery Channel or Animal Planet the content probably won’t be anything you haven’t seen before but, the visuals are worth the cost of admission.
**** out of *****
Movie Review: Knowing
Nicolas Cage can be a great actor. Looking at his IMDB.com listing you find his films run the gamut from truly great (Leaving Las Vegas, Adaptation, Matchstick Men, The Weather Man, Raising Arizona, etc..) to the, well, downright terrible (Ghost Rider, The Wicker Man, etc) and all points in between. Lately his films have been closer to the down side of things. At first glance Knowing didn’t look to be anything special.
It’s 1959 and a new middle school is opening. As a class project each student is drawing a picture to place in a time capsule. Move forward to 2009 for the capsule opening. When the contents are handed out Caleb Koestler (Chandler Canterbury) is given one. He unfolds it to find not a picture, but a list of numbers. Luckily his dad John (Nicolas Cage), is a professor at MIT. He soon uncovers the pattern hidden in the numbers. They detail the date, location, and how many people died in every disaster of the last fifty years. Including three events that have yet to occur. Thus sets in motion a race to figure out the greater meaning behind it all.
Director Alex Proyas is this films biggest strength. He brings the same sense of dread from his previous films (The Crow, Dark City) but places it in more familiar surroundings. Horror filmmakers would do well to recruit Proyas. The scenes in the woods when Caleb receives mysterious visitors are chilling. The camera and the lighting combine to give the strangers an eerie look. The actors body language never tips off their intentions.
The film also scores points for being terrifying in parts. The plane crash is shown in one continuous shot. As it comes down there is a horror of seeing something like that happen but, not being able to do anything. The chaotic aftermath drives home the fact that the list is real, and more people will die.
The ending is a little problematic. Some people will have a hard time accepting it. It’s a something of a tonal shift from the rest of the film. It’s also somewhat clumsily telegraphed early on in some expository dialogue. It’s still affective but this will be a deal-breaker for some viewers.
Knowing is a completely wonderful surprise. Cage is not necessarily at the top of his game but he is as good as the material needs him to be. Alex Proyas does wonders blending high concept Sci-Fi elements, all the while never losing the human aspect of it all. When looking at the quality of the films he has directed it’s not difficult to imagine that he is only a breakout away from being an A-list director.
**** out of *****
Movie Review: Confessions of a Shopaholic
When is a hero not a hero? In movies it has become accepted that we root for whomever the lead actor/actress plays. Regardless of the situation, the person with the most screen time is the hero. Remember the controversy when Jack Nicholson received top billing in Batman? How dare the villainous actor be listed before the hero? Maybe that is the thinking behind Confessions of a Shopaholic.
The story follows Rebecca Bloomwood (Isla Fisher) a writer living in New York City. After being laid off from her job, Rebecca aspires to get on at a high profile fashion magazine. After failing to get the job because she went shopping on the way to the interview, she is advised to apply at a business magazine by the same publisher. She interviews for that job and manages to impress the editor, Luke Brandon (Hugh Dancy), enough to get a shot. Along the way she overspends and seems totally unrepentant about it.
First of all the movie is really disjointed. It tries to juggle Rebecca’s relationship with the editor, her battles with a debt collector, and her struggles with her shopaholic support group. Director P.J. Hogan does a poor job balancing the three plot lines. When it looks like it will focus on the romance, Dancy is off screen for long stretches and is almost forgotten. The scenes with the support group are too short and comical to give the story any emotional weight at all. The debt collector, you know the guy who actually lives up to his responsibilities, is painted as the bad guy whose sole purpose is to ruin Rebecca’s good time.
The biggest problem here is Rebecca herself. In any romance it is important for the audience to see the traits in a character that would make another person fall in love with them. Outside of being attractive, and Isla Fisher is an attractive woman, Rebecca Bloomwood has no attractive qualities.
First, she lies. Oh sure it’s cute when it comes to things like being able to speak Finnish. But consider that every step of the way she misleads everyone. When she interviews for the business magazine job, she lies about her qualifications. When she is given an assignment, she plagiarizes out of a book. Add to this it is not just her boss she lies to, it is also the man she loves.
Secondly, after spending years racking up over $16,000 in credit card debt her instincts tell her to hit up her retired middle-class parents (John Goodman and Joan Cusack) for the cash. This supposedly college educated and independent woman goes running to Mommy and Daddy. She does not seem to care what it could do to their quality of life.
Third, after all her other options run out, she decides to auction off the things she bought to pay her bills. Okay, fair enough at least she is finally taking responsibility for her problems. But she uses all the people from her shopaholic support group to sell the stuff. That would like recruiting bartenders from an Alcoholics Anonymous meeting. Putting people in harms way for her own gain, yeah that is someone to be admired.
Confessions of a Shopaholic is not meant to be anything more than a fun romantic comedy. Despite that, it is hard to feel good about this movie. We can all accept people and pull for them to overcome their flaws. But when that person repeatedly engages in destructive behavior with no regard to the consequences to themselves or loved ones, that is not fun. It’s sad and irresponsible. Just like this movie.
* out of *****
Movie Review: Race to Witch Mountain
In March 1997 I was fortunate to be in attendance at Wrestlemania 13, the biggest wrestling show of the year. On the under card that night a young Rocky Maivia defended his Intercontinental championship against the dreaded Sultan! Maivia was a squeaky clean “babyface”,wrestling slang for good guy. It was clear he was being marketed as a hero for kids. Nothing wrong with that, the only problem, no one really liked him. He was too vanilla for most wrestling fans and was really quite boring.
Later that year he amped up his character, became a cocky bad-ass who adopted a series of memorable catch phrases and changed his name to “The Rock”! After he turned “heel”, bad guy, he became arguably the most popular wrestler of his generation. Years later he became an actor, quit wrestling and started going by his real name of Dwayne Johnson. He may as well have gone back to Rocky Maivia.
Race to Witch Mountain stars Johnson as Jack Bruno, an ex-con trying to go straight by driving a cab in Las Vegas. One day two teens Seth (Alexander Ludwig) and Sara (AnnaSophia Robb) get in his cab with a fistful of cash and vague directions. After being chased by men in black SUVs Bruno soon discovers the two are more then they appear to be. The truth is they are a pair of aliens on a mission to prevent an alien invasion. The men in the black trucks are government agents hot on their trail. To complicate matters they are also being hunted by a “Siphon”, an intergalactic assassin, sent to foil their mission.
It’s not a bad set up for a good old fashioned kids action/adventure romp. It certainly worked for Disney before in the mid 70’s when the company released the films, Escape from Witch Mountain and Return to Witch Mountain, on which this one is based. Both of those films are fondly remembered by a generation of kids who will presumably take their kids to see Race from Witch Mountain. I have a feeling this one won’t be as well remembered as the others.
So what went wrong? For one the script falls flat. There is nothing about this film to get the viewer invested at all in these characters. There is little to no character development in any of it, after all that might require slowing down the story. The pacing is like a video game. There is action and a quick bit of dialog to advance the plot to the next sequence. But nothing of any substance happens in between the action.
Also the villains never feel at all frightening. There is no suspense when facing down the bad guys. The Siphon has a menacing look but nothing to make us feel intimidated. Scene after scene he defeated to the point where he seems like a stooge. He can’t even avoid a falling beam on stage with out even getting knocked out. The government agents aren’t much better.
Fault also falls on director Andy Fickman. Scenes are shot in the most generic manner and he does not have a grasp on on how to make the material work. It’s understandable he didn’t want to make it too dark, it is a family film after all but, he failed to make a movie that would appeal to anyone but maybe young kids.
It’s really contradictory, in the March/April 2009 issue of Creative Screenwriting Magazine Fickman is quoted “Why do we always have to assume family entertainment is playing to the six-year old? Why can’t family entertainment play for the older people and then everyone can enjoy it”. I totally agree with the sentiment, but if you make bland forgettable entertainment, no body is going to enjoy it.
On the plus side Johnson is good in the film. His natural charisma shines through and knows how to handle the action fight scenes. I hate to say it but it seems that movies like Race to Witch Mountain are all he aspires to these days. After an action career that started out promising, Dwayne Johnson has become stuck doing these family type films. This is his second, and one can only hope his last, film with Fickman.
Johnson hasn’t seemed to have learned anything from his wrestling days. Back then he was shoehorned into a role that wasn’t working. While he played the part as well as he could, it just didn’t work. It was only when they found a part that would showcase his strengths that he really was able to shine. It’s a lesson he really needs to learn all over again.
** out of *****
-
Archives
- February 2010 (3)
- January 2010 (2)
- December 2009 (4)
- November 2009 (2)
- October 2009 (2)
- September 2009 (5)
- August 2009 (1)
- May 2009 (1)
- April 2009 (2)
- March 2009 (9)
- February 2009 (1)
- January 2009 (3)
-
Categories
-
RSS
Entries RSS
Comments RSS
